Karnataka's MSME Financial Advisory Partner — Since 2009
✅ Relationship with PSU Banks ✅ CGTMSE Specialist ✅ Udyam & GeM Registrations ✅ Operating Since 2009 ✅ Karnataka-Wide Coverage
HomeKnowledge HubDPR & CMA
DPR & CMA

Common CMA Data Mistakes That Get MSME Loan Files Rejected

Seven specific errors account for most CMA-driven loan rejections across Karnataka — none of them are technical mysteries, and all of them are fixable before the file reaches a bank.

Executive Summary

  • Most CMA errors are preparation and consistency errors, not conceptual ones
  • Figures inconsistent between forms is the single most common issue
  • DSCR miscalculation — omitting depreciation add-back — systematically understates repayment capacity
  • Every one of these is checkable and fixable before submission

The Seven Mistakes

01

Figures inconsistent between forms

Net profit in Form 1 that doesn't match the retained earnings movement in Form 2 is the single most common error — two forms, same underlying figure, different numbers.

02

DSCR computed without depreciation add-back

Using net profit alone rather than (net profit + depreciation + interest) systematically understates genuine repayment capacity and can make a bankable proposal fail the 1.25 threshold.

03

Intangibles included in Tangible Net Worth

Including goodwill or deferred revenue expenditure in TNW overstates apparent equity strength and understates the real TOL/TNW ratio.

04

Current portion of term loan misclassified

The next 12 months of term loan principal due is a current liability — leaving it in non-current understates current liabilities and inflates the current ratio.

05

Current asset projections reverse-engineered from desired MPBF

Building projected current assets backward from the CC limit you want, rather than forward from your actual operating cycle, produces figures a credit officer will question.

06

Fund Flow Statement completed as formality

A loosely prepared Form 5 that doesn't actually reconcile sources and uses coherently is immediately visible to an experienced credit officer reviewing the complete file.

07

CMA figures inconsistent with the DPR narrative

Projected revenue in CMA that doesn't match capacity assumptions stated in the DPR — the most obvious cross-document inconsistency a credit committee actively checks.

"None of these are obscure technical failures. They're preparation failures — the kind that get caught by a systematic cross-check before submission, not discovered during bank appraisal."

How to Self-Review Before Submitting

Before any CMA data file leaves your hands: verify that net profit flows correctly from Form 1 into Form 2's retained earnings; confirm DSCR uses the full three-component numerator; trace TNW explicitly excluding intangibles; reclassify the current year's term loan repayment into current liabilities; and confirm projected current assets are derivable from stated operating cycle assumptions, not from a desired MPBF number. These five checks alone catch six of the seven mistakes above.

DN
Deepak Nandana Founder & Principal Consultant MSME Central, Bengaluru

Every CMA submission I prepare goes through this exact cross-check before it leaves my desk — which is why it rarely returns with queries from the bank.